Foreign Policy Research Institute A Nation Must Think Before it Acts The “Security Dilemma” and the Constitution of 1787
The “Security Dilemma” and the Constitution of 1787

The “Security Dilemma” and the Constitution of 1787

Abstract 

Both Federalists and Antifederalists agreed on the need to strengthen the Union against threats from without and disunion from within. The Federalists, nonetheless, spent much time defending the Union and attacking their opponents as disunionists. The Federalists won because they succeeded in shifting the issue from the questionable necessity of immediate and unamended ratification of their proposed reforms to the vital security necessity of continuation of the Union, on which their opponents in fact agreed.

Read the full article here.

Related Publication(s)